|
|
Post by jasonuk17 on Feb 5, 2015 0:57:24 GMT
So AC Milan can't afford to field a decent team, yet they're going to spend 300 million euro to build a new stadium.....gotta love it Would end the sharing of the San Siro and would belong only to the Rossoneri. It looks beautiful in rendition, but not sure it's needed. Doesn't matter how beautiful the venue is, if the team looks like garbage  www.theguardian.com/football/2015/feb/04/milan-plans-stadium-emirates-london |
|
|
|
Post by bluebeard on Feb 5, 2015 6:25:38 GMT
It's gorgeous, but too costly, unnecessary and the solution to a problem that AC Milan do not have. With that in mind, I hope they plan to name it the Stadio Fernando Torres
|
|
|
|
Post by knabelism on Feb 5, 2015 14:58:11 GMT
It is a seemingly unnecessary expense for a club with financial troubles. That said, the stadium has been renovated 100 times and even though it's almost 2 decades younger than Old Trafford, and unlike United's home, it still isn't a modern stadium and just hasn't really kept up with the trends in sport, despite the last renovation being just 13 years ago. Maybe the stadium is seen as the investment that will generate the revenue needed (assuming the club would own the new stadium) to become a major player again. It would definitely help to have an exclusive home, instead of having to share with Inter. They need something to breathe a little life back into the club.
|
|
|
|
Post by jasonuk17 on Feb 7, 2015 20:29:41 GMT
Yeah, Milan have so many problems, a stadium isn't one
I took Juventus/Milan over 2.5 goals and laid big money; easiest money I've made in a long time. Milan down 2-1 and there's still five min before halftime
|
|
|
|
Post by bluebeard on Feb 11, 2015 16:51:47 GMT
Berlusconi was " satisfied" with the 3-1 defeat to Juve - I suppose when two teams are pretty interchangeable in terms of quality, then a 3-1 defeat is pretty much the same as a 3-1 win... |
|
